Case Peanut Knife

Warning: include(/home/magesekw.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/ccinnov8/public_html/gagedesigns.com/wp-content/plugins/exec-php/includes/runtime.php(42) : eval()'d code on line 1

Warning: include(): Failed opening '/home/magesekw.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/opt/cpanel/ea-php56/root/usr/share/pear') in /home/ccinnov8/public_html/gagedesigns.com/wp-content/plugins/exec-php/includes/runtime.php(42) : eval()'d code on line 1

WASTE MANAGEMENT- ALMITRA H. PATEL vs UNION OF INDIA (A CASE STUDY)

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";} INTRODUCTION   In this project I have researched on a very leading case Almitra H.Patel v. Union of India, which relates to legal aspects of Waste Management inour country. The world is facing pollution problem which is going to have a globaleffect. Waste management of solid and liquid wastes, and the ever-growing airpollution, all these three develop due to industrialisation, urbanisation andglobalisation. It's critical to adopt a broad approach in developing a workingframework for waste management. This covers the social, economic, technological,political and administrative dimensions. For example, the social dimension ofwaste management involves waste minimisation; the economic dimension involveswaste recycling; the technology dimension, waste disposal; and the politicaland administrative dimensions cut across all the three issues of minimisation,recycling and disposal. This study shows how important is waste management,through a case study of Almitra H. Patel v .Union of India, a leading case in environmental protection. It is a shocking fact that noneof the industries that recycle hazardous waste had any facility for safedisposal of such waste in an environmentally sound manner. Most of the environmental cases,in general, are dealt through the PIL (Public InterestLitigation), and this case was also filed by Almitra H. Patel through a PIL.PIL has made others aware about the magnitude of the problem and that it maytake a serious turn if not checked immediately. The, concern of this case studyis to mention how the wastes are harmful for us if proper care for theirdisposal is not taken. The problem of waste management occurs mostly fromurbanised cities starting from household activities. The Indian Courts, Supreme aswell as High Courts, have given new dimensions to the chapter on fundamentalrights in the Constitution in general and Article 21 in particular, in favourof the people and the environment. Article 21 of our Constitution says that noperson's life can be taken away without procedure established by law. The word"life" was extended to “livelihood”, and thereafter it was extendedto rights of prisoners, pollution-free environment, safe drinking water,shelter, privacy, and the right to health etc. The expansion of Article 21enthused the public interest groups approaching the High Courts and the SupremeCourt to seek enforcement of right to have clean and safe environment againstthe polluting industries, against irreversible damage to the environment andinaction/non-action of the Government. This development has taken place withina decade, in particular, the last few years have shown the courts’ activism atits peak concerning environment. The Supreme Court has made obligations of theState to provide safe and clean environment under the Directive Principles alsoenforceable. It is not that our Indian government does not take any action ormake any law related to environment. The law in our country regarding to theenvironment has been enacted since 1927 which is Indian Forest Act, and afterthis a lot of laws were passed and enacted, but the fact is that till whatextent the countrymen follow that. And if these laws regarding environment isnot followed in spirit, it will haunt us ever.   Sources of Environmental law Theinterdependence of environmental law with other disciplines makes it a distinctbranch of law. The law relating to environment is derived from two principlesources, namely, Common law developed by courts through judicial precedents,and the statute law comprising regulations or bye laws. It is said thatenvironmental law is an amalgam of common law and statutory principles.   Almitra H. Patel v. Union ofIndia 2000(2) SCC 166 Appellants: Almitra H. Patel and Anr. Vs. Respondent : Union of India (UOI) andOrs. Hon'bleJudges: J.S.Verma, C.J., B.N. Kirpal and V.N. Khare, JJ. Subject: Environment                   Facts ofthe case: This casewas filed by Almitra H. Patel against Union of India, taking into account thepoor status of Delhi. Historic city Delhi the capital of India is one ofthe most polluted cities in the world. The authorities, responsible forpollution control and environment protection, have not been able to provideclean and healthy environment to the residents of Delhi. The ambient air is somuch polluted that it is difficult to breathe. More and more Delhities aresuffering from respiratory diseases and throat infections. River Yamuna themain source of drinking water supply is the free dumping place for untreatedsewage and industrial waste. Apart from air and water pollution, the city isvirtually an open dustbin. Garbage strewn all over Delhi is a common sight. TheDelhi municipal authority was not taking proper attention to solve the problemof hazardous waste management. This all the condition forced Almitra H. Patelto sue a case against the municipal authority of Delhi. The public of Delhi wassuffering with many diseases like respiratory, skin diseases. All the wastescoming out from the industries were emerged into river Yamuna which was the sourceof drinking water for Delhi, and these wastes affected because the Delhimunicipal authority didn’t take the proper care to manage those wastes.   Issues involved in this case: 1: Was MunicipalCorporation of Delhi responsible for the disorder in the management of thewastes which affected the people of Delhi? 2: Was there lack of safai karamcharis in MCD? 3: Was there needfor the recommendation of the Committee, and who will be the officersresponsible for implementing those recommendations which are accepted?                                 JUDGMENT:(as ordered by the court) 1. We have heard learned AdditionalSolicitor General and Shri Vellapalli, learned Senior Counsel. We consider itappropriate at this stage to constitute a Committee and to specify the specificaspects which the Committee is required to examine. 2. The Committee for Class I Cities(population over one lakh) shall consist of the following: 1)       Mr. Asim Burman, (Commissioner,Chairman Calcutta Municipal Corpn.) 2)       Mr. S. R. Rao, (Secretary, SSI,Member Govt. of Gujarat & ex-Commr Surat) 3) Mr. S. K. Chawla, Chief MemberEngineer, CPWD 4) Mr. P. U. Asnani, (Urban Env. MemberInfrastructure Rep. for India USAID and Consultant, Ahmadabad Mun. Corpn.) 5) Dr. Saroj, (Jt. Director,Member Ministry of Environment & Forests) 6) Mr. Rajat Bhargava,(Commissioner, Member Vijayawada Mun. Corpn.) 7) Mr. Yogendra Tripathi, (Dy.Secy. Member Secretary Urban Dev. MOUA & E) 8) Mrs. Almitra Patel, (Convenor,Member INTACH Waste Network) 3. The terms of Reference for theCommittee shall be as under: To look into all aspects of urbansolid waste management, particularly- 1)       Examine the existing practicesand to suggest hygienic processing and waste disposal practices and proventechnologies on the basis of economic feasibility and safety which theCorporations/Government may directly or indirectly adopt or sponsor. 2)       Examine and suggest ways toimprove conditions in the formal and informal sector for promoting eco-friendlysorting, collection, transportation, disposal, recycling and reuse. 3)       To review municipal bye-laws andthe powers of local bodies and regional planning authorities and suggestnecessary modifications to ensure effective budgeting, financing,administration, monitoring and compliance. 4)       Examine and formulate standardsand regulations for management of urban solid waste, and set time-frames withinwhich the authorities shall be bound to implement the same as directed. 4. The Committee is requested togive its report as early as possible .The Committee is also requested to givesuch interim reports as it may find convenient to do so. 5. The secretarial assistance atDelhi will be provided by the Ministry of Urban Development which will alsomake all other arrangements required by the Committee for its properfunctioning while arrangements within the States/Union Territories would bemade by the State/Union Territory concerned. Expenses incurred for the purposeto the same extent would be borne at this stage by the Ministry of UrbanDevelopment and the State Governments/Union Territories concerned. The finalresponsibility for meeting these expenses would be decided later on. 6. The local authorities and StateGovernments/Union Territories concerned shall extend all cooperation andassistance to the Committee for its proper functioning.   Explanation: In the above judgments the court had decided, therewill be a committee constituted. The court also mentioned the task and therules to be followed by the committee to maintain the pollution caused by thehazardous wastes, and also mentioned that the committee should examine thesituation. The court also appointed some officers according to theirperformance in the respective services they were involved. The court made acommittee for Class I cities & the designations for the committee as mentionedabove in the judgment. The work of the committee was to examine the situationand suggest solutions according to the status of the wastes. The courts focused on the three steps reduce, reuse and recycle, andalso said the committee to promote eco-friendly situations. The court asked thecommittee to submit the report as early as possible.   ReferenceCase:   BangaloreMedical Trust   v.   B. S Muddappa AIR 1991 SC 1902 (Summary of the case) A land designated under the urban planning scheme,for a public park was leased by the state government for a nursing home. TheGovernment justifying its act, by stating that the locality did not have anursing home and it was in public interest that the said lease was given. Thesame lease was challenged in this petition. The Court observed that Public Park as a placereserved for beauty and recreation was developed in 19 th and 20 th century and is associated with growth of the concept of equality andrecognition of importance of common man. Earlier it was a prerogative of thearistocracy and the affluent either as a result of royal grant or as a placereserved for private pleasure. Free and healthy air in beautiful surroundingswas privilege of few. But now it is a 'gift from people to themselves'. Itsimportance has multiplied with emphasis on environment and pollution. In modernplanning and development it occupies an important place in social ecology. Aprivate nursing home on the other hand is essentially a commercial venture, aprofit oriented industry. Service may be its motto, but earning is theobjective. Its utility may not be undermined but a park is a necessity not amere amenity. A private nursing home cannot be a substitute for a public park. In 1984, the Bangalore Development Authority Act (1976)itself provided for reservation of not less than 15% of the total area of thelayout in a development scheme for public park and playgrounds the sale anddisposition of which is prohibited under Sec. 38-A of Bangalore DevelopmentAuthority Act (1976). Further, the Court stated that absence of openspace and Public Park, in present day when urbanisation is on increase, ruralexodus is on large scale and congested areas are coming up rapidly, may giverise to health hazard. To say, therefore, that by conversion of a site reservedfor low lying park into a private nursing home social welfare was beingpromoted was being oblivious of true character of the two and their utility.   ILLEGAL QUANTITY OF WASTES It is difficult to assess howmuch quantity of wastes has come to our country illegally and surreptitiously.We know only the figures which have been collected by the High PoweredCommittee under the chairmanship of Dr. M.G. K. Menon for the year 1996-97 and1997-98. Most of these hazardous wastes has come after the ban imposed by theDelhi High Court and the Supreme Court. The quantum of hazardous wastes lyingat the docks/ports/ICDS for the above mentioned period is as follows:-   Waste Category   Zinc Ash Lead Ash Lead Batteries Waste Oil   Nickel Hydroxide Waste Imported in 1996-97   21976 MT   5020 MT 32561 MT   3517 MT       86 MT Waste Imported in 1997-98 9740 MT 2444 MT 7167 MT 7610 MT  1054MT The quantum of hazardous wastewhich has come to our country in spite of the ban imposed by the Courts clearlyshows-that there is something which is inherently lacking in the law withregard to the regulation and control of hazardous waste and that there is noimplementation of. the existing laws. As already mentioned above, in thepresent case the implementing authorities were totally unaware of the hazardouswaste being imported into the country, not to speak of iii proper managementand disposal in an environmentally safe manner. The State, in law, is not onlybound to implement the conditions imposed in the Basel Convention but is alsounder an obligation to implement   theamendments, if any, which are made periodically in this convention This is alsomade clear by the Supreme Court in one of its directions The State owesindependently a duty not only to protect the environment but also to find outsuch alternatives which are environmental friendly and which reduce andgradually take away the threat arising out of the effects of toxicity in theenvironment. The High Powered Committee headed by Dr. Menon is supposed to lookinto the availability of various environmentally safe alternatives, and tosuggest a list of other hazardous substances which are required to be banned orregulated over and above the list of the Basel Convention. The Supreme Courthas recently expanded the "public trust doctrine" holding that Stateis the trustee of natural resources which are by nature meant for public useand enjoyment. The State is also the trustee and is also under a legal duty toprotect the natural resources. Anybody disturbing the environing' balance andthereby causing damage to the ecology has to be made liable and should bepenalized for the same. It is described as "PolluterPays Principle” vides, Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs. UOI andthe Indian Council for EnvironmentalLegal Action vs. UOI . Those industries which are responsible for damageto the ecology are liable to pay not only to the individual sufferers but alsoto pay for restoring the damage done to the ecology. The Hazardous Waste (Managementand Handling) Rules, 1989 have to be brought in consonance with the BaselConvention; over and above, the Rules have to be framed by keeping in mind thealready alarming pollution level in our country, plugging the loop-holes whicherring industries take resort to. It has to be ensured that any hazardous wastewhich is ultimately permitted for import must contain all the particulars ofvarious components certified by the exporting country and the importing countryshould verify those particulars at the dock itself There should be laboratoryfacilities to check whether the informally provided on the container and in thecertificate are true and correct, if the information is found incorrect thenexporting country should be put under an obligation to take it back and pay thepenalty for sending such wastes. The laboratory facilities should havesophisticated equipment and experts. The necessary amendments in this regardshould be done in the Customs Act as well as various other laws dealingvii& the import. The industry which has imported such hazardous waste mug hasrequisite permission and the facility for safe disposal as a pre-requisitecondition. The lifting of hazardous waste from the docks/ICDS etc. should bedone in a environmentally safe manner. There should be proper record to showthat the hazardous waste has reached the industry   safely and that it was recycled in thatindustry alone and was not given | to any other traders outside. A report withregard to each consigning should remain with such industry and also with theState as well as Central Pollution Control Board. Such reports should also beavailable to the NGOs who have been working in this field. It should be seen bythe authorities that the disposal sites are maintained by the industry properlyin accordance "with the guidelines set up by the State. In case of anythreat to environment immediate steps should be taken by the concernedauthorities. The concerned NGOs should be provided and information with regardto the particulars of each industry, the hazards waste which they arereceiving, recycling and the waste which is dump in the disposal sites. Thiswill permit these NGOs to have a check' pollution level and they will be able togive warning signals to the Government as well as to the people. At this hour when the ecology isunder severe threat from rising pollution, our bio-diversity and indigenousknowledge is being Pirated our food security is in peril and our sovereignty isunder serious attention we must resist all attempts which tend to affect thelives of our people to have fresh air to breathe, to have soil free frompollution, to have safe drinking water and the flora and fauna; without whichthe life itself becomes a meaningless existence. Responsibility of the occupier forhandling of wastes (1) The occupier generating hazardouswastes listed in column (2) of the Schedule in quantities equal to or exceedingthe limits given in column (3) of the said Schedule, shall take all practicalsteps to ensure that such wastes are properly handled and disposed of withoutany adverse effects which may result from such wastes and the occupier shallalso be responsible for proper collection, reception, treatment, storage anddisposal of these wastes either himself or through the operator of a facility. (2) The occupier or any other personacting on his behalf who intends to get his hazardous waste treated by theoperator of a facility under sub-rule (1), shall give to the operator of afacility, such information as may be specified by the State Pollution ControlBoard.   REQUIREMENT FOR LEGAL FRAMEWORK The need for the legislative guidelines is thatthere must be a permanent policy as to landfill management. Even though thesupreme Court expressed the view that landfill as solid waste disposal as notthe permanent solution and suggesting compost plants as alternative method ofsolid waste management, it realised that atleast for next twenty years landfill will be the common practice for solid waste disposal. Further, the AlmitraPatel's case has shown the diverse ramifications including labour law disputesand the dispute between two statutory entities. The Supreme Court had to relyon general provisions of the Constitution of India like Fundamental Rights andDirective Principles of the State Policy to formulate the principles apart fromequally general provisions in Municipality Legislations like the construction,maintenance and cleansing of drains and drainage works and of public latrines, urinalsand similar conveniences.   MUNICIPALITIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTION Constitutional Amendment Municipalities werelegislative creatures with conferred powers. Part IX-A of the constitution ofIndia deals with the municipalities. The municipality is an institution ofself-government. Apart from providing for the election, finance, taxation andfunds, the part also provides for powers, authority and responsibilities of themunicipality. The provision speaks about the devolution of the responsibilitiesupon the municipalities with respect to the preparation of plan for economicdevelopment and social justice and performance of functions and theimplementation of schemes as may be entrusted including those in relation tothe matters listed in the 12 th schedule. The 12 th schedulein constitution of India enumerates important functions of urban administrationincluding urban & town planning, public health, sanitation conservancy andsolid waste management. Further the constitution also provides a committee fordistrict planning to consolidate the plans prepared by the panchayats and themunicipalities in the district and prepare a draft development plan for thedistrict as whole. It specifically contemplates that the draft development planshall have regard to apart from other matters environmental conservation.Similarly, provision for metropolitan planning committee is also provided. Thusthe constitution true to its character has made elaborate provisions empoweringthe municipalities with regard to solid waste management. However at thestatutory level there has not been any initiative to provide for legalframework. The existing rules are either framed by the court or guidelinesformulated from the judiciary.   CONCLUSION After going through the research here I come to aconclusion that how the environment is important for human life as it isdescribed in this case Almitra H. Patel vs. UOI. This case was a leading casefor the management and handling the hazardous wastes on the order of the court.After this case the court brought a very strict action against those who paidcarelessness in the Delhi Municipal Corporation. After this case the rule whichcame out as a strict work for the municipal corporations of metropolitan citiesthat helped a lot to the people of urban cities. Due to this case themanagement of hazardous wastes has been improved. In the order of this case amost important was that, the officers of the corporation have to submit thereport as early as possible and if they don’t do so then strict action will betaken against them. I thank Almitra H. Patel to contr

Find Case Peanut Knife On eBay Below:

Case Yellow Handle Peanut 2 Blade Pocket Knife 3220 CV
Case Yellow Handle Peanut 2 Blade Pocket Knife 3220 CV
$33.00
CASE XX 04970 Limited Edition Rogers Jigged Bone 6220 Black Peanut Knife
CASE XX 04970 Limited Edition Rogers Jigged Bone 6220 Black Peanut Knife
$59.99
Case Carhartt Folding Knife Peanut Clip Pen Molasses Bone 6220SS Pocket 36310
Case Carhartt Folding Knife Peanut Clip Pen Molasses Bone 6220SS Pocket 36310
$43.98
CASE XX 6220 SS PEANUT KNIFE 1990
CASE XX 6220 SS PEANUT KNIFE 1990
$40.00
Case XX Cutlery Peanut Pocket Knife Stainless Blade Amber Jigged Bone Handle
Case XX Cutlery Peanut Pocket Knife Stainless Blade Amber Jigged Bone Handle
$43.69
Case XX Peanut Pocket Knife Carbon Steel Blade Worn Whiskey Jigged Bone Handle
Case XX Peanut Pocket Knife Carbon Steel Blade Worn Whiskey Jigged Bone Handle
$49.98
Case Knife 1999 Stag Barehead Peanut V5220
Case Knife 1999 Stag Barehead Peanut V5220
$59.99
Case Cutlery Peanut Burnt Brown Bone Handle Stainless Folding Blade Knife 23655
Case Cutlery Peanut Burnt Brown Bone Handle Stainless Folding Blade Knife 23655
$49.84
Case Cutlery XX Peanut Crandall Olive Bone Handle Folding Blades Knife 22544
Case Cutlery XX Peanut Crandall Olive Bone Handle Folding Blades Knife 22544
$49.84
Case Cutlery Peanut Whiskey Bone CV Handle Stainless Folding Blade Knife 23009
Case Cutlery Peanut Whiskey Bone CV Handle Stainless Folding Blade Knife 23009
$49.98
Case XX My First Case Peanut Pocket Knife Stainless Blade Worn Red Bone Handle
Case XX My First Case Peanut Pocket Knife Stainless Blade Worn Red Bone Handle
$52.99
NEW Case XX PEANUT 2 blade Folding Knife 8220 SS Item  00521 2004 MOP Handle EX
NEW Case XX PEANUT 2 blade Folding Knife 8220 SS Item 00521 2004 MOP Handle EX
$76.97
Case 2004 Limited Edition Peanut First Edition Christmas Tree 1 50 Knife MIB
Case 2004 Limited Edition Peanut First Edition Christmas Tree 1 50 Knife MIB
$84.99
Case 2000 Limited Edition Peanut Emerald Green Saturn Shield Knife MIB 6220 SS
Case 2000 Limited Edition Peanut Emerald Green Saturn Shield Knife MIB 6220 SS
$54.99
Case 2003 Limited Edition Peanut Antique Bone XX Shield Knife MIB 6220 SS
Case 2003 Limited Edition Peanut Antique Bone XX Shield Knife MIB 6220 SS
$49.99
CASE XX b 2018 GREEN SPARKLE KIRINITE PEANUT KNIFE KNIVES NEW ITEM
CASE XX b 2018 GREEN SPARKLE KIRINITE PEANUT KNIFE KNIVES NEW ITEM
$51.50
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Crandall Olive Bone 22544
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Crandall Olive Bone 22544
$50.98
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Green Sparkle Kirinite 32582
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Green Sparkle Kirinite 32582
$51.98
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Whiskey Bone CV 23009
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Whiskey Bone CV 23009
$49.98
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Chestnut Bone 22876
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Chestnut Bone 22876
$49.98
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Deep Canyon Jig 10908
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Deep Canyon Jig 10908
$50.98
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Burnt Brown Bone 23655
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Burnt Brown Bone 23655
$50.98
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Slant Worked Bolsters 53246
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Slant Worked Bolsters 53246
$71.49
CASE XX  2012 USA RED SYNTHETIC PEANUT KNIFE KNIVES
CASE XX 2012 USA RED SYNTHETIC PEANUT KNIFE KNIVES
$43.99
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Black Corelon 9220ABC
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Black Corelon 9220ABC
$53.48
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Mint Green Bone 55404
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Mint Green Bone 55404
$46.59
Case Cutlery Knives Golden Ruby Peanut 9220GR
Case Cutlery Knives Golden Ruby Peanut 9220GR
$50.81
Case Cutlery Knives US Army Rogers Peanut 15030
Case Cutlery Knives US Army Rogers Peanut 15030
$61.51
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Olive Bone 125th C18801
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Olive Bone 125th C18801
$53.73
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Red Stag 9443
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Red Stag 9443
$66.87
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Patriotic Kirinite 11208
Case Cutlery Knives Peanut Patriotic Kirinite 11208
$49.37
Case Cutlery Knives Caliber Peanut Camo Zytel 18333
Case Cutlery Knives Caliber Peanut Camo Zytel 18333
$27.74
Vintage Case Tested XX 9220 Peanut 1920 1939 rare old folding knives
Vintage Case Tested XX 9220 Peanut 1920 1939 rare old folding knives
$40.00
CASE BURNT PEANUT STAG POCKET KNIFE 5220 SS NIB NO RESERVE
CASE BURNT PEANUT STAG POCKET KNIFE 5220 SS NIB NO RESERVE
$46.00
CASE XX 2008 Patriotic Exotic Knife Peanut 1 500
CASE XX 2008 Patriotic Exotic Knife Peanut 1 500
$175.00
CASE BROWN PEANUT POCKET KNIFE 6220 SS NIB NO RESERVE
CASE BROWN PEANUT POCKET KNIFE 6220 SS NIB NO RESERVE
$14.50
CASE VINTAGE STAG PEANUT BAREHEAD 52950 POCKET KNIFE V5220 SS NIB NO RESERVE
CASE VINTAGE STAG PEANUT BAREHEAD 52950 POCKET KNIFE V5220 SS NIB NO RESERVE
$31.00
CASE XX KNIVES ORANGE HANDLE PEANUT KNIFE 80504 USA MADE NEW GREAT SALE PRICE
CASE XX KNIVES ORANGE HANDLE PEANUT KNIFE 80504 USA MADE NEW GREAT SALE PRICE
$27.95
CASE XX USA2008 5220 PEANUT KNIFE SUPER PRETTY PRIME STAG NICE
CASE XX USA2008 5220 PEANUT KNIFE SUPER PRETTY PRIME STAG NICE
$35.00

Recently Purchased Case Peanut Knife:


2006 case xx limited edition ocean blue bone peanut knife 6220 ss, 2002 case xx limited edition caribbean blue bone peanut knife 6220 ss, case xx g10 peanut us army tan stainless steel folding pocket knife, case xx peanut walnut bone stainless steel folding pocket knife, case xx 6220 ss my first case peanut red folding pocket knife, case old red smooth bone peanut pocket knife, case usa a6220 peanut knifebrass dividers2 34 longappaloosa bone vintage, case xx 36338 my 1st carhartt peanut knife10220 ss new in box 2013 nr, case xx peanut pocket knife lime new limited edition 1 of 3000, case xx orange handle peanut knife ca80504 made in usa brand new in box , case xx usa 2005 3220 custom turquoise handles peanut knife in box, case xx knife lot tony bose sowbelly with christmas peanut 2 knife deal, case xx beautiful custom engraved 24kt purple haze scrolled peanut knife 03, new case xx 9220pk peanut pocket knife 2016 pumpkin box handles matching box, case xx limited edition 33 barnboard mint set brown bone peanut knife knives, case xx 0045 amber bone peanut folding pocket knife 045 new with box 6220 ss, case yellow peanut 2 blade folding knifeknives ca0030 new in box, case xx slant series sapphire glow peanut 12500 stainless 9220ssg knife, case xx usa beautiful knockout white pearl aaa stainless peanut pocket knife, case xx usa beautiful knockout freedom rings aaa peanut pocket knife, case xx tested 1955 chevy ertl truck amp; red stag peanut limited edition knife set, case xx tested 1955 chevy ertl truck amp; midnight stag peanut limited knife set, case xx peanut knife2220, beautiful 2004 case xx stag john deere peanut knife 5220 ss never used, case xx roman numeral peanut knife 6220 ss never used in box, 2001 case xx peanut knife 6220 ss never used , 1999 case xx micarta peanut knife 10220 ss never used in box, 2006 case xx 6220 ss peanut knife never used in box, lot of 3 case peanut knives 6220 never used , case xx peanut knife i220 ss never used, beautiful vintage case knife 9 dot 1981 smooth rose peanut sr62027, 1991 case xx 7220 ss peanut knife never used, lot of 3 case peanut knives 6220 amp; 9220 never used , 1998 case xx select 6220 ss peanut knife never used, rare case xx 5220 stag peanut knife 194064, 2002 case xx 3220 ss knife never used peanut checkered w numbered bolster, lot of 3 case peanut knives 6220 amp; 3220 never used , 2000 case xx bone peanut knife never used 6220 ss w rare double pulls, 2005 case xx limited edition raspberry bone peanut knife 6220 ss, case xx making a case for america peanut knife red bone , 2006 case xx circle c kentucky bluegrass bone peanut knife 6220 ss, case xx usa 6220 ss small 2 blade peanut pocket knife w brown delrin handle , case xx smooth chestnut bone peanut pocket knife 28702 knives, case xx usa red bone 6220 peanut jack knife c 19651969 unsharpened, vintage case xx usa 3220 yellow peanut jack knife c19651969 unsharpened, vintage case xx 2220 slick black peanut jack knife c19401964 unsharpened, vintage case xx red bone 6220 peanut jack knife c 19401964 unsharpened, case xx yellow synthetic handle peanut folding pocket knife 00030 3220 cv usa, case xx usa 2007 bone stag peanut knife 65220 ss new in box 03577 mksc, case 2009 xx shield white peanut knife mib 4220 ss, case xx usa 2220 slick black peanut jack knife c19651969 unsharpened, vintage usa case xx 2220 1965 to 1969 peanut pocket knife, case xx stag handle ss peanut pocket knife, case xx rough green peanut 1500 pocket knife 50470 knives, case xx 6220 peanut 2008 red jig bone €making a case for america € pocket knife, case xx 65220 burnt bone peanut knife 2 78 b854, case xx usa 7220 green curly wood 278 peanut 2 blade jack knife mint, case xx peanut knife christmas stocking gift package 7 items, case xx 2016 gray smooth bone peanut knife knives, rare case xx usa 1989 mint set christmas tree peanut knife 1 of 500 nice 5216, case xx usa beautiful knockout magic dragon aaa peanut pocket knife, case xx usa beautiful knockout midnight sapphire aaa peanut pocket knife, case xx usa beautiful knockout deep sapphire aaa stainless peanut pocket knife, case knives mother of pearl peanut